Friday, January 29, 2010

Kayak/Lost Partnership? Try this search...

Thanks to a Facebook posting from our good friend (and recovering airline/OTA exec) Ellen Lee, we found a curious flight display on Kayak this morning...

Try a search for a one-way ticket from SYD to LAX departing on 09/22/2010. The results display a rather expensive flight from "Oceanic Airlines" as below

We won't spoil the fun, but try to book this flight and see where you end up.

Good fun from Kayak (maybe a little morbid given it is a travel site?) and a really interesting viral marketing play.

Wednesday, January 20, 2010

OTAs Win on Taxes in Texas

A trial court in Houston today dismissed a case brought by the City of Houston against the major online travel agencies for nonpayment of occupancy taxes. The court issued a summary judgement indicating that the judge found the evidence supporting the plaintiffs' case insufficient to even proceed to trial.

This ruling is a big win for the OTAs as the court looked at the same language in which a San Antonio jury concluded that the OTAs (somehow) control hotels. We took a look at this ruling back in November and concluded that ruling was a draw. Based on today's ruling, we are going to give it to the OTAs, minus legal fees and the overall distraction factor, of course. San Antonio, see you on appeal as they say...

TripIt Gets Serious About Business Travel: New Blackberry App


TripIt has announced a new application for Blackberry, allowing BB users to view all their travel plans just like iPhone and Android users have been able to for some time. All of the regular TripIt functionality has been adapted for the 'berry including flight status inquiries, directions and, of course, the Tripit Pro features.

As TripIt continues to move closer to the business travel world, supporting the Blackberry has become more critical given the device's deep penetration into corporate IT platforms.

Obviously, TripIt (and Hotwire.com) founder Gregg Brockway's itineraries are not the sample screen shots. As Gregg would no doubt agree, the likelihood of him splurging on the George V in Paris is about as likely as pigs flying.

Priceline's New TV Ad Brings Revenue Management 101 to the People

Today, Priceline.com launched a new TV ad campaign featuring a new Shatner side-kick known as "Big Deal." Not only is the Big Deal big, but he also appears to have a deep understanding of hotel revenue management (in addition to some really nice tats.)

In the spot, Shatner calls in Big Deal to help negotiate with a hapless front desk clerk who initially refuses the $65 price Shatner suggests. Big Deal intones "is it wise to allow a perishable item to spoil?" Shatner follows with "Is it wise to leave a room empty" to which Big Deal adds "The additional revenue easily covers operating costs." Shatner closes the negotiation with "$65 is better than no dollars." As you would expect, the clerk relents.

A rather high-brow discussion (lead by a decidedly low-brow, knuckle-cracking, meat head, no less) of the principles on which Priceline operates is an interesting advertising ploy. Educating consumers of the intricacies of the model is a first - some hoteliers are still trying to figure it out, let alone consumers. But it may expand the market if more consumers can get comfortable with how Priceline actually gets such good pricing.

And how will hoteliers react? Given the revenue they are seeing from Priceline these days, they will probably just take a deep breath and keep offering those $65 rates...

Watch the ad:

Friday, January 15, 2010

"Hiltonizing:" A New Verb in Continuing Starwood/Hilton Fight

We've been watching this lawsuit go forward with interest for some time now. As you'll recall, Starwood sued Hilton over two senior executives (Ross Kline and Amar Lalvani) who departed and managed to show up at Hilton with seemingly truckloads of confidential documents relating to Starwood's luxury brands. Hilton fired Ross and Amar and sent the documents back to Starwood but claimed they didn't really appear to be confidential documents. Denizen, Hilton's new luxury brand, bit the dust soon after the first lawsuit was filed. The suit even contains a quote from this blog describing the similarity of Denizen to W at the brand launch - what foresight!

As first reported in today's WSJ, Starwood filed an amended complaint today in New York District Court alledging further wrong-doing by Hilton. Most shocking in the new complaint is the seemingly personal attacks against Hilton CEO Nassetta. Starwood is going for the jugular by attacking the senior management team at Hilton.

We've pulled the document (all 130+ pages of it) and posted it here for your weekend reading pleasure.

But in case you don't have time or inclination, we'll post a few of the best parts of this spectacle below:

It appears that the sheer amount of documents (and copies thereof) were truly enormous. Starwood (with just a touch of drama-queen) writes in the amended complaint:

"Hilton has delivered to Starwood hundreds of thousands of pages of documents and computer files retrieved from Hilton offices and the homes of Hilton employees around the world, and there is no end in sight. Deliveries of documents pursuant to the Preliminary Injunction continue, and documents were received as recently as yesterday, nearly a year later. This mountain of undisputed evidence...."

And many of the documents were sent by "Starwood employees used as corporate spies" recruited by Klien using personal email accounts with cute notes attached to the files like: “fyi, I do not ck this email from work so it is ok to send stuff on.” Obviously, the computer science major who wrote these words didn't quite understand how nothing is really ever "ok to send stuff on"

And here is a great quote from an email from Lalvani regarding a potential W in Thailand: “Here’s an interesting one. . . . I have good connections with the owner. Lets discuss protocol during my transition on deals like this so we don’t miss them but also dealing with the fact we don’t have a lifestyle offering yet. This is going to be fun!!” Fun indeed.

And Hilton allegedly made it easy for all of the team to use the Starwood documents by uploading them onto Hilton's common drive:

“[W]ere you able to retrieve that strategic development list of cities/countries from Amar’s discs? Maybe you sent it and I missed it? We now need it urgently. Could you send to me or show me where to search?”

In response, Swierk informed Mani:
“I asked Joy to put all of those documents on the s: drive so they are all located in s:HPP/HPP Development/W docs.”

And "Hiltonizing" the stolen documents was a top priority:

"Further to our discussions earlier today, I think we need to have your team work with you ASAP on Hiltonizing this and sharing it with the Exec Group ASAP."

Starwood's asks of the Court in response to Hilton's actions are unprecedented; the best of which include:
  • Court appointment of one or more “monitors” to assure Hilton’s compliance with all injunctions and Hilton’s non-use, directly, indirectly or derivatively of any Starwood Confidential Information or information derived therefrom;
  • Euthanizing Hilton’s terminally infected Denizen Hotels brand;
  • Imposing a “penalty box” or “time out” enjoining for an appropriate time period any further development of Hilton’s luxury and lifestyle brands to compensate Starwood for Hilton’s unjust enrichment from its wrongful use of Starwood Confidential Information across all of Hilton’s luxury and lifestyle brands
Starwood is asking for a baby sitter to watch over Hilton and is even suggesting a "time out" - obviously the drafting lawyer has children.

Still, our favorite has to be the request to "euthanize" the "terminally infected" Denizen brand. Again, spectacular drama.

As we mentioned, Starwood is clearly going in for the kill with this - but at what cost we wonder? Lawsuits are not Starwood's core business - hospitality is. If the allegations are true, Starwood is clearly entitled to relief but one wonders if such a nasty public feud is in the best interests of anyone.

Thursday, January 14, 2010

Hotels.com Updates Loyalty Program welcomerewards

Hotels.com today announced a re-tooling of their loyalty program, welcomerewards. Welcome Rewards was announced in October 2008 and was (or is) the first robust frequency program offered by an online travel agency. Maybe it was a little too robust.

welcomerewards offered a simple proposition: Stay 10 nights, get one free. Each stay had to be $40 or higher and you could use your free night for up to a $400 hotel stay. In other words, a really good deal.

Today, some enhancements were announced such as extending the expiration of credits and a removal of the $40 minimum rate requirement. (Handy for those $18 rooms in Vegas)
However, the big change was on the redemption side - no longer will members be able to claim a room valued at up to $400.

Instead, Hotels.com will average the room the room rates over the ten stays and offer that amount as a credit towards a future booking. For example, if a customer buys five room nights at $75, two at $200 and three at $100, they would now be eligible for a free night valued at up to $107.50 rather than the previous $400.

We are not totally surprised by this change - the program seemed almost too good to be true when launched - Welcomerewards was a better offering than anything the chain hotels offered through their loyalty programs and certainly the broadest redemption possibilities. Compared to Starwood Preferred Guest, for example, the same spending levels in the example above (for a non-elite member) would have earned 2150 StarPoints - yes, enough for a free weekend night at the lowest of the low redemption categories - but certainly not a $400 value. I doubt that any of the Starwood SPG Category One hotels ever see an ADR of $400!

United Air Feels the Hyatt Touch: Tom O'Toole Named CMO

United Airlines (UAUA) has named travel industry veteran Tom O'Toole as their new Chief Marketing Officer. Tom was previously CMO and CIO (yes, he actually wore both hats!) for Global Hyatt Corporation(H) until his departure last at the end of 2009.

Tom's appointment marks the first move we can think of from Hyatt to United - most industry talent has flowed the other direction.

Appointing a non-airline (albeit a very well versed) expert to the marketing helm at United may be just what United needs to help drive a new course. The challenge, as always, will be in delivering at the operational level what has been promised - we bet Tom's unique blend of operational and marketing experience will be a great help in making that happen.

And here's hoping that Tom doesn't break any guitars.